09-14-2014, 09:42 AM
(09-14-2014, 08:43 AM)UnNamedGER link Wrote:Avengence NeedleThis mission has a lot of potential, just needs some tweaking. Finally we get the chance to use SMGs.
Nice mission, a shame the convoy seems to have gone missing.
(09-14-2014, 08:43 AM)UnNamedGER link Wrote:Game of dronesDon't blame yourself, at that point we were attacked from so many directions and overran by CSAT special forces there was nothing we you could do.
great mission, but we really need to stay mobile, also i got my team fucked up when I didn't realise that everyone was trying to get a look at the ifrt when the AT fired and thous bunched up around him, I should have had everyone else get to cover or at least spread out and away from the AT a an AT is sure to draw fire if there are enemy around.
Note to mission leaders. To my opinion - In attack missions, all leaders, all the time, need to have their team doing one of the following (unless in special occasions, like waiting in an ambush for the enemy to arrive):
1a. Advancing
1b. Attacking
2a. Disengaging
2b. Retreating
If your team is not doing any of the above, you are doing it wrong. Note that the list doesn't mention defending. Since more often than not, we are in enemy territory and outnumbered, trying to defend an area will always lead to your demise.
Always ask yourself what your team is doing, if it's nothing proactive, then take the initiative and haul-ass even if it means ordering several times to people to disengage (in heavy engagements one "disengage!" order will never be enough...)
(09-14-2014, 08:43 AM)UnNamedGER link Wrote:Mad MinotaurI don't like the only medic revive setup. It makes the medic so valuable that the reasonable thing is to keep him out of the fight all the time. Maybe two per team will allow more flexibility in operating them for purposes other than reviving.
I liked the mission, but at least one medic per team would be great. otherwise the "only medic can revive" is not too bad I think.
We wrote extensive review in the mission's page, but the author has yet to respond. If he won't, I think we better edit it ourselves, I think it's good enough for us to invest the effort.
The fewer men, the greater share of honor