03-20-2016, 02:26 PM
Yes both Charlie and alpha/bravo AO have support on call if anyone escapes the area via vehicle, they will also create a small road block with the vehicles and stand sentry.
(03-20-2016, 11:36 AM)Brad link Wrote:that task is bugged/not working, had some issues due to the blufor being detected whilst undercover in the cartels truck, usually ticks on exit of the area as long as you drive back through the rd block, had it working before so not sure of the issue. Sounds like it all went as I had intended the jet turning up at hazar bagh is due too enemy escaping via motorbike, if anyone noticed ?
(03-20-2016, 02:26 PM)Brad link Wrote:Yes both Charlie and alpha/bravo AO have support on call if anyone escapes the area via vehicle, they will also create a small road block with the vehicles and stand sentry.
Fog is a complex atmospheric phenomenon.
It is a visible mass consisting of cloud water droplets or ice crystals suspended in the air at or near the Earth's surface.
In turn, fog has affected many human activities, such as shipping, travel, and warfare.
(03-21-2016, 08:55 PM)Sithis link Wrote:Zavarak Data Heist
(Charlie Group Leader)
Our first LZ was way too close to the target and so we ended up in front of an APC and a roadblock.
We already discussed what happened in the following minute and it ended with the APC burning and the objective achieved.
Quote:After pickup the new LZs were again way to close to the target, but after protest the pilots made it work anyway. The assault went smoothly and I was just about to organize the second assault when I was shot by a sniper.
(03-22-2016, 09:20 AM)Sithis link Wrote:Number one was the radio tower. The marked LZ was on the road downhill from the radiotower. This means that even an HMG or AT weapon placed close to the objective to protect it would have been able to engage the helicopter at any point and most critically while landed at the LZ. There is no way for a pilot to recon a hidden heavy weapon like that until he is dead.
Quote:Number two was the within range of AA.
Quote:Now it is probably more a question of doctrine than execution how high a risk is acceptable on insertion, but when you only survive, because APC and infantry 40 meters away werent able to detect a landing helicopter in plain sight, it is a clear sign that more conservative LZs are advisable.
Quote:I had a quick glanze on the map and didn't like what I saw, objected, but was told to go there in a wide route. still didn't like the first LZ
(03-22-2016, 09:20 AM)Sithis link Wrote:Now it is probably more a question of doctrine than execution how high a risk is acceptable on insertion, but when you only survive, because APC and infantry 40 meters away werent able to detect a landing helicopter in plain sight, it is a clear sign that more conservative LZs are advisable.
Quote:Your line of argument would prohibit any sort of helicopter insertion into enemy territory since there can always be hidden AA threads anywhere, so we might as well ditch choppers altogehter
Quote:Let me think... how many AA missiles were fired at us? That's right, zero.
Quote:I say again, not landing on top of an APC is THE PILOT'S TASK, not the team leader.
Quote:Your argument could be applied to the entire area of the map, there could be a patrolling APC or aircraft anywhere.
Quote:In any real-life situation you would probably have more intel.
Quote:We do not have a doctrine
Quote:If you want safety in landing zones, be prepared to spent half the evening walking, because no sane landing zone would be within a kilometer of a known AA threat in reality.
(03-22-2016, 12:32 PM)Sithis link Wrote:Well doctrine for a lack of better word. Like the standart formations in use and the balance between safety and danger. What should I call that instead?
Quote:But as soon as the downtimes are much longer than the actual action/planing/firefights, it gets boring.
Quote:As I said, this is a game, this is NOT military.
(03-22-2016, 12:32 PM)Sithis link Wrote:We do have known enemy locations. Of course we have to take some risks, but instead of landing between the enemies Kamikaze style we could do two things:
Quote:Yes, but not thanks to planning and knowledge of the enemy AA set up, but thanks to luck. One unseen terrain feature or one AA in a slightly different spot and that would have been it.
Quote:It is 100% the leaders task. Espacially when on the next insertion one pilot says it is to risky and the leader says "well you will do it anyway". We are talking transport helicopters not recon choppers. The pilot has no way of knowing weather the LZ is safe until something blows him to pieces. It is the leaders responsibility to minimize that risk.
Quote:Well we have 1 km walk in several missions, so I did not see this as an issue.